Saturday, April 13, 2019

Mina is that you? By Haley Aguilar


  In the film adaptation of Bram Stokers Dracula by Francis Coppola, the relationship between Mina and Dracula is transformed from one-sided to that of a serious love interest. In the novel, Mina is a strong-minded and cunning woman but in the movie, the audience is suddenly lacking that aspect of her character and in its place is a weak, submissive damsel. There are only a few real moments that Mina is seen as strong when she is with Lucy and begins typing on her typewriter and the other when she first meets Dracula. She brushes off his attempts to speak to her, at first, and then suddenly she is apologizing for having a mind of her own.
  Mina’s romance with Dracula in the movie illustrates Hollywood’s idea that there always needs to be a great romance in a story for it to be compelling. The novel love that Dracula has for Mina is not enough for a movie audience because it is not reciprocated the way that it is in the movie. In the movie, Mina becomes enthralled with Dracula and cheats on Johnathan with him, not physically, but she surrenders her heart to Dracula, which in many ways is worse. Mina portrays the damsel very easily in the movie. Her character falls from a good representation of the new woman to a poor representation of the angel in the house. I say a poor representation because of her easy infidelity with her fiancee and her obvious sexual desires which in those times were unacceptable.
  Mina is put on a pedestal by Van Helsing in the novel because she was cunning enough to portray herself to them as the angel of the house while simultaneously showing them bits and pieces of what Van Helsing referred to as a “man brain”. However, in the movie, she is seen as nothing more than another object of lust as further proven by her first interaction with Van Helsing in the movie when he literally just looks her up and down without speaking to her then dismisses her as if nothing has just happened. It is also shown later when she is with Van Helsing as she is transitioning, she is easily able to seduce him, even though he knows of Johnathan and what Mina is becoming.
  Johnathan is missing from Mina for nearly the entire movie which is another major difference from the novel that was made to allow for Dracula and Mina’s romance to come to fruition. I do not believe that it would have survived had Mina had the constant reminder of Jonathan’s presence because, at the end of the movie, Dracula’s thrall is only lessened by the reminder of her then husband. The scene that is read as a threesome between Mina, Dracula, and Johnathan in the novel is altered to include only Dracula and Mina and I believe that in doing so, it made the moment all the more intimate. Mina completely surrenders herself to Dracula at that moment, making the decision to join him which may not have been the case if Johnathan had been there. In order to make Mina the all consumed by love woman, they had to remove the true object of her affections.
  Mina is a very complicated character in the novel who is reduced to an object of sexual desire in the film. Her great love with Dracula serves the purpose to further break it away from the novel in means of its plot. Her true intelligence is never showcased nor hinted at, leaving only her beauty as her main characteristic for the audience to recognize her by.


1 comment:

  1. Great perspective and analysis of Mina! I definitely thought that Mina would be more bold and we would be able to see her wit come through given how she was portrayed in the novel. I was disappointed to find that Mina was almost too "helpless" in a sense. She surrenders herself a lot to societal constraints, expectations of herself (in comparison to Lucy), but most importantly to Dracula himself. In the movie it was hard to not see Mina other than an object of sexual desire as you mention and it is evident that this portrayal is important to keep audiences engaged.

    ReplyDelete

Sookie's Real Disability

Sookie's Real Disability Sookie Stackhouse calling her superpower a disability is universally annoying and self-pitying, but what de...